Is one god being mistaken for another on purpose?

I was searching the internet looking for information for another post and I came upon coin that I think is a blatant image of one god while historians, numasmatic and/or antiquity specialists are calling it another god.

Now you’re probably saying to yourself “whats the big deal, if its not one god, its probably another, who cares?”

My answer is simple, when historians start creating labels for items that add to a false narrative or simply place absolutes on things that need to be questioned, we lose the idea or possible alternative stories, we lose the ability to be a little creative as what really happen, just to fit the item or finding into the nice square box called “dogmatic history”.

Things like naming it one god over another, can really change the perception of the past and possibly the importance of the things, people, or places people were susceptible to back then. Maybe they didn’t care about what the historians want us to think they cared about. Or maybe they cared more about something else, or someone else and the historians don’t want us to know that (which adds the conspiracy mystery). Either way, its not being told to us, the options or ideas that might just be. They just label it “A” and move on. Then forever in books and stories it’s “A” when in fact this whole time is “CDE”.

Anyway, as I ramble, here is a pretty neat example of this happening.

HELIOS Cameo

Glass paste cameo. Supposedly 1st century

This is supposed to be the face of Helios, the greek god of the sun.

Though there are depictions of Helios with a type of rays or spike array around his head, there’s usually a disc where the rays are coming from, noticeably around his head. In this instant, it is not so.

Helios 5 century BC

I think that the coin above looks more like this:

Ishtar on left, Lady liberty or LIbertas on right

Meet Ishtar or Libertas or Isis or Inanna or Astarte or Aphrodite(Afro-dité) (OR Ishhara, Irnini, Anunit, Atarsamain, Esther, or Aster). Whatever ancient culture or language you speak, she’s got a name.

The following is a quote taken from a great article written by Stillness in the Storm, Agent of Conscious Evolution. Great read. Please click the link if you want to read the article in its entirety.

“Libertas was the name of an ancient Roman goddess adopted by the Romans perhaps as early as the 5th century BC and certainly by the 4th Century BC….This goddess was the goddess of freedom because she promoted the ideals for the personal freedom to do anything that felt good. She was called the matron goddess of prostitution because she promoted sexual freedom…….Many women who gained freedom later turned to prostitution to survive and thereby retained Libertas as their goddess, especially if they became priestesses in the Libertas cult. Libertas was also a goddess of war in order to fight for freedom”

Now that sounds awfully like a line from 1984…

“WAR IS PEACE”

I digress..

“….Cicero who writes of this goddess and her Temple on the Aventine Way in Rome. She was depicted on some Roman coins as wearing a freedom cap…..We know of Libertas being referred to as the Mother of Harlots by the famous Roman historian (and senator) Cicero’s writings. Cicero indicates that she was also a very early goddess of the Greeks even before early Roman civilization developed.”

Starting to really feel like that circular green image is her.

“Upon further investigation we find that the Greeks had acquired knowledge of this being from previous empires in the Middle East and Egypt. This goddess was called Ashtoreth in Hebrew and in the Old Testament’s Greek version (the Septuagint).

Ashtoreth becomes transliterated into the Greek as Astarte, which became the early Greek name for the goddess until it was later changed to Aphrodite. The Hebrew term Ashtoreth was itself a transliteration from the Babylonian dialect (Akkadian) term of Ishtar.

Ishtar in the most ancient of times was also referred to by the Sumerian dialect as Inanna or Ninanna meaning the Queen of Heaven or Lady of Heaven. In Canaan this deity was called Ashtaroth. The Hittites called her Shaushka. The Phoenicians on Cypress initially referred to her as Astarte.

Isis was the name the Egyptians gave to her. This is how the goddess became introduced to the earliest Greeks.

Most had phonetic language roots in the transliterating aspects of the name Ishtar and this remained so until the Greeks changed the name to Aphrodite. Later the Romans referred to her in the Latin, initially as Libertas and later as Venus when they accepted more than just the Liberty doctrines.

SO THERE IT IS.

Here’s another image of what historians called Helios, I can see why, because there are horses, but Helios didn’t have wings, Ishtar did!

Cameo of glass, engraved with a youthful winged deity, perhaps Helios (says the british museum)

I mean, they can’t think past Helios? This figure above has a left breast, really pronounced, a dainty leg and wings.

Seems more feminine like this…

Another one, is this Helios again or did we stop thinking outside the box?

3rd century bce Made in what is now Spain
Helios again (sigh) 220-179 bc

There’s a trend building here. I feel, antiquity (if it existed, and that’s a story for another time) worshiped this deity WAAAAAAY more than Helios. And historians do not want to give the credit where credit is due. I think because if we really knew that European ancestors worshiped this Ishtar/ISIS so on and so forth, we’d awaken to the idea that its still being worshiped around us today.

Columbia pictures image
Emblem for France

Another idea I had was, maybe there weren’t as many god/goddess as we think. Maybe Helios was feminized or Ishtar, masculinized (especially depending on the region – many believe Athena and Aphrodite are the same god). Maybe they were one in the same!

There are some theories that go around that isis and osiris (usir) is actually one in the same – Isis being birth and Osiris being death; Isis being light, Osiris being Darkness. Maybe this is what’s happening above.

Here’s another curious thing adding fuel to my argument. Notice on the coin below, it’s supposedly “Libertas” coin from the Roman Empire.

Notice the angle of her body

Now this next coin is curious in that it comes from the Kushan dynasty (around 2 century).

Helios facing left with radiating halo, wearing coat and cloak, holding hilt of sword with left hand and making benediction with right hand. Tamgha in left field

Supposedly this is what the coin looks like if perfectly kept:

Helios on a Roman coin

I’m to believe they are different coins?? Numasmatic pro’s think that many people’s, empire’s, etc copied one another and used similar gestures.

I think we need to re-evaluate the idea that Helios was either a separate god or that maybe it was just another name for the light aka Ishtar/Isis.

They do wear the same headdress and hold a scepter …..

Another idea…

Fragmentary cameo of glass paste imitating sardonyx, engraved with Hermaphrodite (?) reclining on a couch; an Eros stands behind

Notice this Cameo..”Eros stands behind” who is Eros/Cupid usually around? Aphrodite!

Notice how this cameo looks very very similar to the Cameo above with the horses… Body is styled the same way!

Meet Hermaphrodite (son of Hermes and Aphrodite).

And despite the fact that you may find some small works barely mentioning “hermaphrodites” in 2nd or 3rd century BCE, You only really start to hear about the mythology of Hermaphrodite 100’s of years later after statues like this:

Supposedly can be around 3rd century BC (look hoe feminine the body)

Another similarity to add to the pile is the Colossus of Rhodes

Yes that is supposed to be Helios AGAIN!

Fascinating that Lady liberty is very similar to the Colossus.

Again, maybe they are one in the same or maybe……

In 274 the Roman emperor Aurelian made Sol Invictus “the Unconquered Sun” an official Roman cult

“But it was during the rule of Constantine the Great that the cult of Deus Sol Invictus reached extraordinary heights, so that his reign was even spoken of as a Sun Emperorship. Constantine was the personification of Deus Sol Invictus on earth, and could consider the statue of the sun in the Forum bearing his name as a statue of himself” (Gaston H. Halsberghe, The Cult of Sol Invictus, 1972, p. 167)

taken from http://www.onegodonelord.com/sundaylaw

And maybe, just maybe, “they” (#TPTB) want us to worship their same god – a hermaphroditic sun god who is watching our every move.

Something to think about…..

Just keep in mind, that the above argument point is based almost completely on conventional dating of objects and historical chronology (which by the way doesnt hold much water…but “they” won’t tell you that).

BUT WHAT IF:

  • the dating of the coins, cameos, etc are wrong?
  • what if the coins, cameos, etc were not made in antiquity, but the middle ages but MADE to look like they came from an older time?
  • another previous culture built the colossus and lady liberty and it was just said it was built in more recent times?
  • the coins, cameos, etc are not from the specific cultures they are say they are from ie. Roman empire, Sumerian, Kushan, etc but from another culture altogether?
  • everything you are told about gods/goddesses and even historical references like Caesar, are just contrived creations from medieval time?
  • these findings are created or were created to create a false narrative of history to justify current historical and political actions?

Just more things to think about when you look another “Roman” coin or “greek” god or even a cameo of “Caesar”.

#tartarian #rewrittenhistory

Published by obsessed researcher

I want to learn more...

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started